The first lower office employees spoke from the floor when the NoC was handed over to the bank. According to a recent report, this is contrary to the letter and spirit of the Chandigarh market law.

Chandigarh: Despite a scandal registered in the Punjab and Haryana Supreme Courts in Chandigarh up to the ceiling, UT officials have announced they will stop speaking out as the office issues the state NoC for TU banks.

The first lower office employees spoke from the floor when the NoC was handed over to the bank. According to a recent report, this is contrary to the letter and spirit of the Chandigarh market law.

The office charge imposed by Harjeet Singh Sandhu, an AEO supporter, is as follows: and Chandigarh’s legal resources “have a toll percentage, such as 20%, 30% or 50% nationwide.”

According to them, many government banks and private companies have stopped lending to tenants who intend to buy land in various houses in Chandigarh.

The EU leadership recently sued the Supreme Court, and the sharing of the fraud plan is not allowed, although it is not forbidden to live in the building more than once. A written statement from UT officials said: “In fact, the construction of buildings is acceptable for the whole building, not for one building.”

The guarantee also states that: “In addition, no part of the building is allowed to be sold and the Chandigarh administration will not allow the sale unless it is registered between 2001 and 2007 and” The Chandigarh Housing Rules 2001. “

UN officials have filed a lawsuit against China’s Supreme Court, and the case will reach court on September 20.

PIL HC is for sale

The PIL higher court is seeking restrictions on the change of residences to residences. It is said that in recent years the provinces have been sold as apartments, destroying the city and increasing the burden of major projects. The authors told the Supreme Court that real estate registration is based on interest as a way to promote rental housing.

According to the city manager plan, there was no provision for renting housing, but the building was sold as rent, according to the applicants. As a result, the three-story building was made into three parts, which addressed the need for urban development, a lawyer represented in court.

The SLP violates the HC’s mandate in the SC

The secretary argued before the Supreme Court in the SLP that there was nothing to prevent many people, even diverse families, from buying the house, warning that the house should be built by a company and the same thing.

Once the house plan is approved and approved by the relevant authorities, how can the occupants of the house live better, due to the maintenance of their building and incompetence? people have to live by such rules house, which added that such a study should not be conducted in the event of death.

Translate »